Stanford–Binet Test: Structure, Scores & the SD-16 Confusion
The SB5's five factors, its adaptive routing, and the standard-deviation change from 16 to 15 that makes old Stanford–Binet scores incomparable with new ones.
In-depth, research-based guides on IQ scores, intelligence testing, demographics and how to take a test — from the IQCognify editorial team.
The SB5's five factors, its adaptive routing, and the standard-deviation change from 16 to 15 that makes old Stanford–Binet scores incomparable with new ones.
Guinness retired the highest-IQ record in 1990. Where the famous 228 came from, why the test's own manual capped at 170, and why no IQ above 200 is measured.
Heritability rises from 20% in infancy to 80% in later adulthood — and means almost nothing people think it means. Why it depends on the society doing the measuring.
11,430 people trained for six weeks and transferred nothing. Near vs far transfer, the n-back replication failure, and why the FTC fined Lumosity $2 million.
The canonical .51 validity for cognitive ability was inflated by a flawed correction. The corrected figure is .31 — behind structured interviews and biodata.
The WISC-V Full Scale IQ comes from seven subtests, not ten — and independent factor analysis of 16 models does not support its five-factor structure.
Spatial ability predicts STEM achievement beyond maths and verbal — and no admissions test measures it. The 217-study meta-analysis showing it can be trained.
Verbal ability rises into your sixties, and is stable enough that clinicians use vocabulary to estimate the IQ you had before an illness. Plus where that method fails.
A test is never valid — an interpretation is. Reliability, validity, standard error, norming and latent variables, explained from the governing Standards.